Connect with us

Finances

Houston ‘Rent A Dick’ Legal professional Faces One other Six Determine Sanctions Order

Published

on

Spread the love

For the second time in three months, Houston plaintiffs’ legal professional Eric B. Dick has been ordered to reimburse an insurer greater than $100,000 for submitting a “frivolous, groundless” lawsuit made “solely for the aim of harassment.”

Advertisement

Galveston County District Court docket Decide Kerry L. Neves stated in a Jan. 23 summary judgment {that a} lawsuit filed by Dick towards Normal Casualty Co. on behalf of plaintiffs Steven and Jacqueline Burns was introduced forth in dangerous religion. Dick and the Dick Legislation Agency failed to offer any admissible proof that Normal violated its coverage contract to the Burns over harm the plaintiffs alleged they incurred throughout Winter Storm Uri in 2021, the order states.

“[The] Court docket finds that there isn’t any evidentiary assist for any declare pled by Plaintiffs on this lawsuit and that the lawsuit was groundless and introduced for an improper function, together with to trigger pointless delay and the unnecessary enhance of the price of litigation,” Neves wrote.

Advertisement

The court docket awarded Normal $101,671 in legal professional’s charges and $12,848.68 in prices towards the plaintiffs, Dick and the Dick Legislation Agency.

The order comes not even two months after a Harris County Civil Court sanctioned Dick $137,000 for appearing in dangerous religion for submitting a “frivolous” and “groundless” lawsuit towards the identical insurer. The court docket stated Dick did not submit proof that Normal owed protection to a plaintiff property proprietor.

Advertisement

In each circumstances, Dick named skilled witnesses to testify concerning the loss who had been both unaware that that they had been named as consultants or who had not inspected the alleged harm.

Steven Badger

“Each courts known as out Dick’s apply of designating the identical consultants in each certainly one of his issues with out having truly formally retained them within the particular case and asking them to formulate opinions,” stated Steven Badger, a companion with the Zelle regulation agency who has defended insurers towards different lawsuits filed by Dick.

Dick didn’t reply to Insurance coverage Journal’s request for remark.

Advertisement

Ana Nguyen, a licensed public adjuster, was designated as an skilled within the Burns lawsuit. Nguyen testified that she had by no means seen or accepted her designation. “As of the date of her disposition, she didn’t even know what her opinions could be or the premise on which she would rely to assist any opinions,” Neves wrote.

Nguyen didn’t put together a report, solely an excel spreadsheet of broken gadgets. Nguyen requested the plaintiffs to offer any pictures, however she didn’t obtain them. They might not present the requested proof of possession, nor any worth paid for any merchandise, the age of the merchandise, or the date required.

Advertisement

Nguyen wouldn’t testy beneath oath that the plaintiffs sustained substitute value worth loss on the quantity on her spreadsheet: $544,131.

The court docket wrote that the counsel’s failure to current proof to assist the claims is proof that “the lawsuit, from its inception, was frivolous, groundless, and made solely for the aim of harassment.”

Advertisement

Badger stated that the sanctions order illustrates that the mass-lawsuit submitting mannequin employed by Dick doesn’t work with first-party claims.

“This requires the policyholder legal professional to really examine and show their claims,” Badger stated. “Clearly, this isn’t one thing Dick is ready to do along with his mass-lawsuit filings.”

Advertisement
Eric Dick

Dick is well-known within the Houston space as an aggressive plaintiffs’ legal professional with a historical past of taking over insurance coverage claims. Dick leans into crude puns in billboard and tv promoting with phrases like “Rent a Dick” and “I’ll work lengthy and laborious for you.”

Dick informed Claims Journal in November that the Harris County sanctions had been “100% political.” Dick accused the choose, LaShawn Williams, of weaponizing the justice system as a result of she is a Democrat whereas Dick is a registered Republican.

“That is how these corrupt judges do it,” Dick stated. “This is identical manner they’re doing it with Donald Trump.”

Advertisement

Dick has been accused of violating marketing campaign finance legal guidelines in his 2022 run for Harris County treasurer. In September the Texas Elections Fee ordered him to pay a $10,000 civil penalty for failing to report $151,166 in marketing campaign expenditures in his marketing campaign for treasurer.

Advertisement

Crucial insurance coverage information,in your inbox each enterprise day.

Get the insurance coverage trade’s trusted publication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.