Connect with us


Appeals Court docket Overturns $366M FedEx Race Bias Verdict



Spread the love

A federal appeals courtroom on Thursday threw out a $366.2 million verdict in opposition to FedEx in a case introduced by a Black gross sales supervisor who stated the bundle supply firm fired her in retaliation for accusing her supervisor of race discrimination.

The fifth U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals stated the plaintiff, Jennifer Harris, was entitled to not one of the $365 million of punitive damages {that a} Houston jury awarded her in October 2022.


It additionally decreased Harris’ damages for ache and struggling, psychological anguish and inconvenience to $248,620 from $1.16 million, regardless of discovering enough proof to help her retaliation declare.

FedEx stated in a press release that it stays assured that it acted correctly relating to the termination of Harris’ employment and is happy with the courtroom’s resolution to scale back the damages.


Harris’ legal professionals didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.

The award in opposition to Memphis, Tennessee-based FedEx had been among the many largest in a U.S. office bias or retaliation case involving a single employee.


Harris had labored for FedEx for greater than 12 years, first as a gross sales consultant and finally as a district gross sales supervisor, earlier than being fired in January 2020.

She stated her firing stemmed from her complaints about her supervisor, a white girl, who had given her a poor efficiency overview and who Harris alleged had tried to demote her.


However the New Orleans-based appeals courtroom stated Harris didn’t meet the “heavy burden” below Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 of displaying that FedEx acted with malice or reckless indifference towards her, within the face of a “perceived danger” that its actions would violate federal regulation.

Circuit Decide Cory Wilson stated the proof recommended that the supervisor believed Harris must be disciplined for insubordination, not in retaliation for her complaints.


“For punitive damages, it’s the employer’s subjective intent that issues,” Wilson wrote for a three-judge panel.

The case is Harris v. FedEx Company Companies Inc, fifth U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals, No. 23-20035.


Crucial insurance coverage information,in your inbox each enterprise day.

Get the insurance coverage business’s trusted publication

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.